• Explore
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Community
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
Menu

Exploring Information Security

Securing the Future - A Journey into Cybersecurity Exploration
  • Explore
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Community
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact

Generated with Gemini

Unraveling the Critical Zero-Day SharePoint Vulnerability CVE-2025-53770

July 24, 2025

ExploreSec will be doing a live podcast recording on August 19. Details can be found at Meetup.com and will be available on the ExploreSec YouTube channel after the date.

Executive Summary

This overview provides a critical overview of CVE-2025-53770, a severe zero-day Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability actively being exploited in on-premises Microsoft SharePoint servers. With a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 (Critical), this flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code and gain full system control without user interaction. The exploit, known as "ToolShell," is particularly dangerous as it not only achieves initial compromise but also steals cryptographic machine keys, enabling persistent access even after patching or reboots.

The urgency is amplified by its inclusion in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog and widespread active exploitation campaigns targeting government, software, and telecommunications sectors globally. Organizations with internet-facing on-premises SharePoint servers should assume compromise and take immediate action.

Key actions include:

  • Immediate Patching: Apply Microsoft's latest security updates for SharePoint Server Subscription Edition (KB5002768) and SharePoint Server 2019 (KB5002754) on an emergency basis. Unsupported versions (2010, 2013) must be isolated or upgraded.

  • Crucial Post-Patching Step: Rotate ASP.NET Machine Keys (ValidationKey and DecryptionKey) to invalidate stolen cryptographic material and prevent persistent re-entry by attackers.

  • Interim Mitigations: If immediate patching is not possible, enable AMSI integration, deploy Microsoft Defender AV, and consider disconnecting public-facing servers from the internet.

  • Detection & Response: Actively hunt for Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) like suspicious process chains (w3wp.exe spawning cmd.exe then powershell.exe) and unexpected .aspx web shells. Initiate a rapid incident response if compromise is detected or assumed.

This incident underscores the critical need for continuous vulnerability management, proactive threat hunting, and a strong focus on securing fundamental IT infrastructure to defend against sophisticated, persistent threats.

The Looming Threat to On-Premises SharePoint

Organizations globally are facing an immediate and severe threat from CVE-2025-53770, a critical zero-day Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability actively being exploited in the wild. This flaw specifically targets on-premises Microsoft SharePoint servers, posing a direct danger to collaborative environments and the sensitive data they hold. With a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), this vulnerability signifies the highest level of severity, indicating potential for complete system compromise without authentication or user interaction.

The confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2025-53770 underscores that this is not a theoretical risk but a present and ongoing attack. Threat actors were leveraging this vulnerability as a zero-day even before Microsoft's public disclosure, giving them a significant head start.

Unpacking the Vulnerability: What is CVE-2025-53770?

The technical root cause of CVE-2025-53770 is rooted in the "improper deserialization of untrusted data". Deserialization is the process by which an application converts data from a stored or transmitted format back into a usable object. When SharePoint attempts to deserialize specially crafted, malicious data from an attacker without sufficient validation, it can lead to the execution of arbitrary code on the server. This specific type of flaw is categorized as CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data), a well-known and high-impact vulnerability class. The persistence of such fundamental flaws, even in widely used enterprise software, indicates a systemic challenge in secure software development and configuration.

This critical flaw impacts several on-premises Microsoft SharePoint Server versions: SharePoint Server 2016, SharePoint Server 2019, and the Subscription Edition. It is crucial to note that older, unsupported versions such as SharePoint Server 2010 and 2013 are also affected and are particularly vulnerable due to the absence of official security updates. It is important to clarify that SharePoint Online (Microsoft 365) is not affected by this vulnerability. However, organizations running self-managed SharePoint Server instances in cloud environments, such as Azure, AWS, or GCP, are indeed vulnerable, as the underlying software remains the same. Data indicates that approximately 9% of cloud environments currently host resources running these vulnerable self-managed SharePoint versions. This distinction highlights that simply moving infrastructure to the cloud does not automatically absolve organizations of their security responsibilities; the deployment model (SaaS vs. self-managed IaaS/PaaS) dictates the shared security burden.

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 assigned to CVE-2025-53770 underscores its severe implications. This score reflects an attack vector over the network, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed, leading to high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This combination makes the vulnerability exceptionally easy for attackers to exploit and achieve full system compromise, reinforcing the urgent need for action.

The "ToolShell" Exploit Chain: A Persistent Threat

The exploit chain leveraging CVE-2025-53770, publicly known as "ToolShell," first emerged into the spotlight during the Pwn2Own hacking competition in May 2025. During this event, Viettel Cyber Security demonstrated how to chain an authentication bypass (CVE-2025-49706) with a deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49704) to achieve unauthenticated RCE on SharePoint. What makes the current situation particularly concerning is that CVE-2025-53770 is not an entirely new vulnerability, but rather a direct "patch bypass" for the previously addressed CVE-2025-49704. Similarly, CVE-2025-53771 acts as a patch bypass for CVE-2025-49706. This rapid cycle of exploit, patch, and bypass demonstrates a high level of sophistication among threat actors, who are actively reverse-engineering vendor patches to discover and exploit weaknesses, thereby significantly reducing the window for defenders to implement effective countermeasures.

The ToolShell exploit chain operates in a calculated, multi-stage process designed for initial compromise and long-term persistence:

  1. Stage 1: Authentication Bypass (leveraging CVE-2025-53771): The attack initiates with a crafted POST request targeting the /_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx endpoint, a legacy component within SharePoint. The core of this authentication bypass relies on manipulating the Referer header, setting it to /_layouts/SignOut.aspx. This clever trick deceives the SharePoint server into treating the attacker's request as legitimate and authenticated, effectively bypassing initial security checks and granting privileged access.

  2. Stage 2: Remote Code Execution via Deserialization (CVE-2025-53770): Once authenticated access is established, the attacker proceeds to interact with the ToolPane.aspx endpoint. A carefully constructed malicious payload is then submitted within the body of the POST request. This payload triggers the insecure deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-53770), causing the SharePoint application to convert the attacker-controlled data into executable code on the server. This typically results in the deployment of a stealthy ASPX web shell, often named something like spinstall0.aspx, into a SharePoint directory. This web shell then provides persistent remote access to the compromised server.

  3. Stage 3: The Long-Game – Possessing Cryptographic Keys: This final stage is what distinguishes ToolShell as an exceptionally dangerous and persistent threat. Immediately after establishing the web shell, attackers utilize it to extract critical cryptographic material from the SharePoint server's machineKey configuration: specifically, the ValidationKey and DecryptionKey. The possession of these keys grants threat actors the ability to independently forge valid authentication tokens and __VIEWSTATE payloads. This means that even if the initial web shell is discovered and removed, or if the server is rebooted, the attackers can re-establish control and execute new malicious payloads on the compromised server at will. This capability transforms a temporary breach into a deep, cryptographic-level compromise, fundamentally altering the scope of remediation required.

Why This Vulnerability Demands Immediate Attention

The urgency surrounding CVE-2025-53770 is underscored by several critical factors, signaling a severe and active threat to organizations globally.

First, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added CVE-2025-53770 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog on July 20, 2025, just one day after Microsoft's disclosure. The KEV catalog is a curated list of vulnerabilities that are confirmed to be actively exploited by malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks. While CISA's Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 mandates remediation for federal agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations, regardless of sector, to prioritize timely remediation of KEV vulnerabilities. This swift inclusion serves as a universal warning that the vulnerability is not only critical but is being actively weaponized and poses a proven, immediate threat to all sectors.

  • High Volume of Attacks: Cloudflare's WAF Managed Rules observed a significant peak of approximately 300,000 HTTP request matches for the vulnerability around 11 AM UTC on July 22. This immense volume indicates a large-scale, automated scanning and exploitation effort, targeting any exposed SharePoint server.

  • Confirmed Compromises: Reports confirm that the vulnerability has led to the compromise of at least 75 company servers, including major corporations and US government agencies. This demonstrates tangible, real-world impact across diverse targets.

  • Opportunistic Global Campaigns: Bitdefender's analysis confirms "active, widespread exploitation" globally, noting that these attacks are "typically opportunistic rather than highly targeted". This pattern indicates that while initial attacks might target high-value entities, once a zero-day is weaponized, it quickly transitions into automated scanning and exploitation campaigns, making every internet-facing, unpatched SharePoint server a potential target, regardless of the organization's size or perceived value.

  • Targeted Initial Attacks: Check Point Research identified the first exploitation attempts as early as July 7th, targeting a major Western government, with attacks intensifying on July 18th and 19th from specific IP addresses: 104.238.159.149, 107.191.58.76, and 96.9.125.147. These attacks have targeted sectors including government, software, and telecommunications in North America and Western Europe.

  • Behavioral Detections: Rapid7 has observed active exploitation in customer environments through specific behavioral indicators, such as w3wp.exe (IIS worker process) spawning cmd.exe, which then spawns powershell.exe -EncodedCommand. These process chains serve as high-confidence detections of successful exploitation.

  • Cloud Exposure: Even in cloud environments, Wiz data highlights that 9% of self-managed SharePoint instances are running vulnerable versions, extending the attack surface beyond traditional on-premises deployments and emphasizing that cloud hosting does not inherently guarantee security for self-managed applications.

Given the zero-day nature, confirmed active exploitation, and the sophisticated persistence mechanism (cryptographic key theft), the cybersecurity community's consensus is clear: "any organization with an on-premise SharePoint server on the Internet should assume it has been compromised and take immediate action to fully address this vulnerability". This proactive stance is critical because detection might come too late, and the focus must immediately shift to containment and comprehensive remediation. Furthermore, while initial compromise may occur rapidly, the most damaging follow-up attacks, such as ransomware deployment or data exfiltration, often occur days or even weeks later. This creates a crucial, albeit limited, window of opportunity for defenders to act and prevent further damage, emphasizing that a lack of immediate, obvious signs of compromise does not equate to safety.

Action Plan: Comprehensive Mitigation and Defense

Addressing CVE-2025-53770 requires a multi-faceted and urgent approach, encompassing immediate patching, crucial post-patching steps, and interim mitigations.

Prioritize Patching on an Emergency Basis:

The most critical and immediate step is to apply the latest security updates released by Microsoft. This must be done on an emergency basis, without waiting for regular patch cycles, as the vulnerability is actively exploited in the wild.

  • For SharePoint Server Subscription Edition, apply security update KB5002768.

  • For SharePoint Server 2019, apply security update KB5002754.

  • For SharePoint Server 2016, organizations should closely monitor Microsoft's official channels for the release of the patch.

  • Unsupported Versions (2010, 2013): These versions have reached end-of-life and will not receive official patches. They are considered highly exposed and should be immediately isolated from the network or upgraded to a supported version.

Crucial Post-Patching Step: Rotate ASP.NET Machine Keys:

This step is paramount and often overlooked. Attackers exploiting CVE-2025-53770 steal the SharePoint server's ValidationKey and DecryptionKey for persistent access, which can survive patches, server reboots, or the removal of web shells. Rotating these keys invalidates any cryptographic material potentially stolen by attackers, thereby severing their persistent foothold and preventing re-entry. This action is not merely a best practice but an absolutely essential component of full remediation for any potentially compromised system.

  • How to Perform: This can be done via PowerShell using the Update-SPMachineKey cmdlet or through SharePoint Central Administration (navigate to Monitoring > Review job definition, then locate and run the "Machine Key Rotation Job").

  • Final Step: Following key rotation, it is essential to execute iisreset.exe on all SharePoint servers to ensure the new keys are fully loaded and in effect.

Interim Mitigations (If Immediate Patching is Not Possible):

If security updates cannot be applied immediately, Microsoft and CISA strongly recommend implementing the following interim mitigations to reduce exposure:

  • Enable AMSI Integration & Deploy Defender AV: Configure Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) integration in SharePoint and ensure an antivirus solution, such as Microsoft Defender AV, is actively deployed on all SharePoint servers. This provides a crucial layer of defense against unauthenticated attacks and helps detect post-exploit activities. This demonstrates the importance of a layered security approach, providing protection when primary defenses like a direct patch are unavailable.

  • Disconnect Public-Facing Servers from the Internet: As a last resort, if AMSI cannot be enabled or patches cannot be applied immediately, it is strongly recommended to disconnect any affected public-facing SharePoint servers from the internet until official mitigations are fully in place. While this will disrupt services, it will prevent external exploitation and contain potential spread.

The necessity of both patching and key rotation for true remediation highlights a critical nuance in incident response for sophisticated attacks. Simply applying the patch closes the initial vulnerability, but it does not remove the attacker's ability to re-enter if they have already stolen the cryptographic keys. Therefore, security teams must understand the attacker's full kill chain, including persistence mechanisms, and implement corresponding countermeasures. Failure to perform key rotation means that even a patched system remains vulnerable to re-compromise by the same attacker, rendering significant remediation efforts ineffective. This underscores the importance of meticulously following detailed, vendor-specific guidance.

Detecting and Responding to Potential Compromise

Given the confirmed active exploitation as a zero-day and the nature of the persistence mechanism (cryptographic key theft), it is prudent for any organization with an internet-facing on-premises SharePoint server to "assume compromise". This proactive mindset is crucial for initiating a thorough and effective incident response, acknowledging that detection might already be too late for some systems.

Organizations must actively hunt for the following specific Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) within their environments:

  • Suspicious Process Chains: Monitor for unusual process execution, particularly w3wp.exe (the IIS worker process) spawning cmd.exe, which then spawns powershell.exe -EncodedCommand. This specific sequence is considered a high-confidence detection for this exploitation and is a prime example of why behavioral detection is crucial for zero-day threats where traditional signatures may not exist.

  • Suspicious File Creation: Look for the presence of unexpected or suspicious .aspx files, especially spinstall0.aspx, in SharePoint directories such as C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\16\TEMPLATE\LAYOUTS\. These files often serve as web shells for persistent access.

  • Network Activity Patterns: Monitor for POST requests directed to /_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit, which is the endpoint exploited by the ToolShell chain. Additionally, conduct scanning for connections to known attacker IP addresses, particularly those observed between July 18-19, 2025: 107.191.58.76, 104.238.159.149, and 96.9.125.147.

  • Security Rule Updates: Ensure that intrusion prevention system (IPS) and web application firewall (WAF) rules are updated to block known exploit patterns and anomalous behavior associated with this vulnerability.

If compromise is assumed or detected, a rapid and comprehensive incident response must be initiated:

  • Isolate and Shut Down: Immediately isolate or shut down affected servers to prevent further compromise and lateral movement within the network.

  • Revoke and Rotate Credentials: Revoke any potentially compromised user accounts or service accounts, and rotate all associated secrets and credentials.

  • Audit and Minimize Privileges: Conduct a thorough audit of SharePoint layout and administrative privileges, minimizing access to only what is strictly necessary.

  • Engage Incident Response Teams: Engage your internal Security Operations Center (SOC) or external incident response specialists for a deep forensic investigation, eradication, and recovery.

  • Comprehensive Logging: Ensure comprehensive logging is enabled and reviewed regularly to identify exploitation activity and aid in forensic analysis.

The observation that initial compromise often serves as a "beachhead," with the most damaging follow-up attacks (e.g., ransomware, data exfiltration) occurring days or weeks later, highlights a critical "window of opportunity" for defenders. This implies that rapid detection and a well-rehearsed incident response plan are paramount. The focus shifts from merely preventing initial access to minimizing the blast radius and preventing subsequent, more damaging attack phases. This reinforces the need for strong internal communication, clear escalation paths, and pre-defined playbooks for critical incidents that prioritize containment and eradication before the attacker can achieve their ultimate objectives.

Conclusion

CVE-2025-53770 represents a critical and actively exploited zero-day threat to on-premises Microsoft SharePoint servers. Its high severity, coupled with the sophisticated "ToolShell" exploit chain's ability to achieve persistent access through cryptographic key theft, demands immediate and decisive action from all affected organizations.

The imperative is clear: apply the latest security updates without delay, and crucially, rotate your ASP.NET Machine Keys to invalidate any potentially stolen cryptographic material. Implement interim mitigations like enabling AMSI and deploying robust antivirus solutions, and be prepared to disconnect public-facing servers if patching is not immediately feasible. Beyond these urgent steps, cultivate a proactive security posture by investing in continuous vulnerability management, proactive threat hunting, and a strong focus on foundational infrastructure security.

Links and Contributions

  • https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/categories/msrc/

  • Contribution: This Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) blog served as a primary source for confirming Microsoft's awareness of the active attacks targeting on-premises SharePoint servers and the assignment of CVE-2025-53770. It also provided initial guidance on mitigations and detections.

  • https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-protects-against-critical-sharepoint-vulnerability-cve-2025-53770/

    • Contribution: This article was crucial for detailing the "ToolShell" exploit chain, including its origin at the Pwn2Own competition and its nature as a patch bypass for previous vulnerabilities. It provided a breakdown of the three attack stages (authentication bypass, RCE via deserialization, and cryptographic key theft for persistence). It also offered insights into the widespread nature of the attacks, citing Cloudflare's WAF Managed Rules observations of high HTTP request matches.

  • https://blog.checkpoint.com/research/sharepoint-zero-day-cve-2025-53770-actively-exploited-what-security-teams-need-to-know/

    • Contribution: This Check Point Research blog provided specific details on the active exploitation, including the earliest observed attack dates (July 7th), the intensification of attacks from specific IP addresses, and the targeted sectors (government, software, telecommunications) and geographies (North America, Western Europe). It also highlighted the chaining of CVE-2025-53770 with other vulnerabilities like Ivanti EPMM flaws.

  • https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-zero-day-exploitation-of-microsoft-sharepoint-servers-cve-2025-53770/

    • Contribution: This Rapid7 blog confirmed the zero-day exploitation of CVE-2025-53770 and its classification as a patch bypass. It detailed the sophisticated nature of the campaign, emphasizing the goal of establishing persistent access through cryptographic key extraction. It also provided high-confidence behavioral detection indicators, such as specific process chains (w3wp.exe spawning cmd.exe then powershell.exe).

  • https://www.indusface.com/blog/key-cybersecurity-statistics/

    • Contribution: This resource provided valuable statistics on the increasing volume of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) reported annually and daily. It also offered data on the surge in vulnerability-based attacks, linking it to the growing accessibility of Large Language Model (LLM) tools, and statistics on breaches related to application vulnerabilities and stolen credentials.

  • https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2025-53770/

    • Contribution: This site provided core technical details about CVE-2025-53770, including its CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), its classification as CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data), and confirmation of its addition to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. It also outlined CISA's recommended interim mitigation actions.

  • https://www.axonius.com/blog/cve-2025-53770

    • Contribution: This blog post was used to confirm the critical nature of the vulnerability, the affected SharePoint Server versions (2016, 2019, Subscription Edition), and Microsoft's recommended remediation steps, including the crucial process of rotating ASP.NET machine keys and restarting IIS. It also reiterated interim mitigations like AMSI integration and disconnecting public-facing servers.

  • https://www.wiz.io/blog/sharepoint-vulnerabilities-cve-2025-53770-cve-2025-53771-everything-you-need-to-k

    • Contribution: This article offered a comprehensive overview of both CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771, detailing their roles in the "ToolShell" exploit chain. It provided specific affected SharePoint versions, clarified that SharePoint Online is not affected, but self-managed cloud instances are. It also outlined the exploit's stages, including the specific endpoint and the theft of cryptographic keys, and provided detailed patching and mitigation instructions.

  • https://tech.co/news/data-breaches-updated-list

    • Contribution: This resource provided recent real-world examples of significant data breaches, such as those affecting Anne Arundel Dermatology, Compumedics USA, and McLaren Health Care. These examples were used to illustrate the severe financial, reputational, and compliance risks associated with successful cyberattacks.

  • https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/businessinsights/bitdefender-advisory-rce-vulnerability-microsoft-sharepoint-server-cve-2025-53770ce

    • Contribution: Bitdefender's analysis confirmed widespread, opportunistic exploitation globally and highlighted that initial compromise often serves as a "beachhead" for more damaging follow-up attacks days or weeks later, emphasizing a crucial window of opportunity for defenders. It also provided specific patching instructions and reinforced the importance of rotating ASP.NET Machine Keys.

  • https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2025/07/20/microsoft-releases-guidance-exploitation-sharepoint-vulnerability-cve-2025-53770

    • Contribution: This CISA alert confirmed the agency's awareness of active exploitation and the addition of CVE-2025-53770 to the KEV catalog. It provided specific Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) for monitoring, including suspicious POST requests and attacker IP addresses, and recommended updating intrusion prevention system (IPS) and web application firewall (WAF) rules.

  • https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2025/07/20/cisa-adds-one-known-exploited-vulnerability-cve-2025-53770-toolshell-catalog

    • Contribution: This CISA announcement explicitly stated the addition of CVE-2025-53770 "ToolShell" to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, underscoring its confirmed active exploitation and the agency's strong recommendation for all organizations to prioritize its remediation.

  • https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/microsoft-sharepoint-zero-day-breach-hits-75-servers-heres-what-the-company-said/articleshow/122805393.cms

    • Contribution: This news article confirmed the active exploitation of the zero-day vulnerability, reporting that it had led to the compromise of at least 75 company servers, including major corporations and US government agencies. It reiterated the CVSS score, the deserialization root cause, and the theft of cryptographic keys for persistent access.

In News, Advice Tags Vulnerability, Zero Day, Incident Response, threat intelligence
Comment

Avoiding Legal Landmines in Incident Response: A Practical Guide for Security Teams

December 10, 2024

The information provided in this blog post does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; rather, the ensuing conversation is for general informational purposes only.

In today’s cybersecurity landscape, responding swiftly and effectively to security incidents is critical. However, navigating the legal implications during an incident is equally vital to protect an organization from further liabilities. This guide covers essential strategies for avoiding the most common legal pitfalls in incident response (IR), based on insights from my recent podcast episode with cybersecurity attorney Thomas Ritter Exploring Legal Landmines in Incident Response.

Use Careful Terminology: “Incident” vs. “Breach”

When a security event occurs, the language you use to describe it can have significant legal implications. Terms like “breach” have specific legal definitions that can trigger mandatory notification requirements or other regulatory obligations. As a best practice, use neutral terms like “incident” until the situation is fully assessed by legal counsel.

  • Tip: Train your teams on preferred terminology and involve legal early in the process to make sure everyone understands when and how to escalate terms like “breach.”

Establish Attorney-Client Privilege Early

Engaging external counsel immediately after a security incident helps protect sensitive communications and investigative findings under attorney-client privilege. This protection is crucial should your organization face litigation, as it limits the exposure of certain communications during the discovery process.

  • Tip: Collaborate with your legal team to establish protocols for involving external counsel, even for minor incidents, to ensure privilege is in place if needed.

Refine Your Communication Strategy

Transparency is key during incident response, but be cautious with internal and external communications, especially in the early stages. Avoid speculative statements and keep communications brief until forensic findings provide a clearer picture.

  • Tip: Work with your legal and PR teams to develop standardized communications templates for different scenarios, ensuring clarity and consistency without compromising on accuracy.

Define Roles and Responsibilities in Your IR Plan

Many incident response plans (IRPs) lack a clear delineation of responsibilities, particularly regarding who determines when an incident becomes a breach. Ideally, legal counsel—preferably external—should make this determination to preserve objectivity and privilege.

  • Tip: Review your IRP to ensure that roles and escalation points are well defined, with legal counsel involved at key decision points.

Handle Ransomware Negotiations Carefully

Ransomware incidents often involve complex decisions about whether to engage with or pay threat actors. Professional negotiators can play a valuable role here, as they are well-versed in handling threat actor communications and negotiating terms without compromising your organization’s legal standing.

  • Tip: Always hire professionals for ransomware negotiations. Amateur negotiators risk mishandling sensitive communications, which can exacerbate both financial and reputational damage.

Prepare for Possible Class Action Litigation

In the event of a data breach, it’s increasingly common for affected parties to file class action lawsuits. Many legal teams recommend proactive measures to limit liability, such as documented protocols that show your team acted swiftly and responsibly during the incident.

  • Tip: Ensure your IR documentation is thorough and compliant with industry standards, as this can provide valuable evidence should litigation arise.

Use Tabletop Exercises to Strengthen Incident Preparedness

Incident response tabletop exercises, especially those involving executive teams, help prepare your organization to navigate both operational and legal complexities in a crisis. In addition to familiarizing staff with the IRP, tabletop exercises offer an opportunity to practice coordination with legal counsel, PR, and executive stakeholders.

  • Tip: Schedule annual or biannual tabletop exercises that simulate high-stakes incidents, like ransomware attacks, to ensure all teams are familiar with legal protocols.

Conclusion: A Proactive Legal Strategy in Incident Response

Responding to a security incident without considering legal implications can expose your organization to additional risks. By carefully navigating language, establishing attorney-client privilege, and preparing staff with tabletop exercises, your organization can avoid many of the legal pitfalls associated with incident response. Whether preparing for regulatory inquiries or class action lawsuits, these best practices can help your organization respond to incidents effectively and with minimized legal exposure.

In Advice Tags Legal, Incident Response
Comment

Blue Team Starter Kit - Forensics with Redline

December 8, 2015

“I guess we’ll just re-image the box then” is the phrase I often used early in my IT career. That was standing operating procedure for a compromised machine. We would receive a SOC alert. We would go kick the user off the box and have it re-imaged. That is until I found Mandiant’s (Now Fireye’s) Redline tool.

What is Redline?

It’s a free tool that allows me to do an investigation on potentially compromised boxes. With the tool, I started getting a better understanding of why compromises occurred. That information allowed us to make better decisions about defenses in place. It also allowed us to provide valuable feedback to the Security Operations Center (SOC).

The tool has several features that can be useful for analysis. This article will focus on the timeline feature. The timeline collects all the log sources from the computer and puts it all in one location for analysis. This is useful for investigating incidents where an incidents specific time frame is available.

The tool also features a Malware Risk Index (MRI) score and Indicators of Compromise (IOCs).  MRI is for analyzing processes and IOCs for artifact defining. Refer to the user guide for more information on using these.

Alternative Tools

Before we get to Redline, I would like to mention a few alternatives. Volatility is a tool that I hear a lot of infosec people raving about. It’s a memory forensics and analysis tool and from the sound of it does a lot of the same things Redline does. I have never used the tool, but I see plenty of professionals talking about it.

There’s also the SANS Investigative Forensics Toolkit (SIFT). Which is a VMware workstation loaded with forensics tools. It’s been awhile since I’ve used the tool. From what I remember this tool requires a little more advanced knowledge of forensics. Still, it’s another free option to perform forensics analysis on potentially compromised computers.*

*As you may have noticed by now I keep using the word “potentially” compromised computers. That’s because one of things I discovered using Redline is that false positives happen.

How to use Redline

Download and install Redline. I would also recommend downloading the user guide as well. The user guide is how I got started using the tool. It will explain the ins and the outs in much more depth than I intend to here. In fact, I recommend stopping here and just using the user guide.

Still with me? Let us proceed.

Launch Redline and, click on the “Create a Comprehensive Collector” link. This will create the collection package. Check the box for “Acquire Memory Image.” A lot of malicious activities happen in memory. Collecting what’s in memory is vital.* Next, decide where the collection package will reside on the computer. Click OK to create the package.

*When responding to an incident, disconnect the computer from the network or contain it in a separate VLAN. Avoid rebooting or shutting down. A reboot or shutdown will wipe whatever is in memory.

When a compromised computer is discovered, get the collection package on the computer. There are a few options for getting the package on a computer. Packages can be pre-deployed to all boxes in the organization. USB is another option. The organization’s environment will determine the best method for accomplishing this.

To run the package, execute the “RunRedlineAudit” batch file in the collection package. A command prompt (black box) will pop-up and begin run a script to collect all the events on the computer. The collection can take several hours depending on how much is on the computer, it’s processing power, how much memory it has, etc.

Once the script completes, open it in Redline. On Redline’s main page, click the link for “Open Previous Analysis” under Analyze Data. Go to Sessions -> AnalysisSession and select the .mans file. Click Open. Redline will now load the session. This part of the process can take some time as well.

After the session opens, click on the option to investigate based on an external source. There are other options for starting an investigation. Refer to the user guide for explanations on these. A Timeline will appear with all events from registry changes, browsing history, event logs. A Timeline Configuration pane is available for refining the timeline. Computers create a ton of events, so it can take some time to load everything. Which is why it's a good idea to define a time period. Go to the Time Wrinkle tab and set a number of minutes before and after a certain time period. If the information available on the incident is vague, a wider time period may be needed. For more accurate time a smaller time period can be used.

For the most part, when I received a SOC alert the information I received was exact down to the second. I would use only two minutes before and after a specific time. When I didn’t have an exact time, I would go as high as 15 mins before and after. One thing to note is that the time on events is in GMT time. A conversion to GMT is needed to match the time from the incident to the computer (+4 or +5 hours).

Now go through the timeline and look for anything associated with the incident. Use Google to research any suspicious events. One incident I responded to, several users had clicked a phishing email. A block box had popped up on their machine and then went away. We ran Redline on the machines and found that an .exe had been dropped in the Windows temp folder. In other instances I would see the anti-virus or EMET step in and block the attack. Look for anything suspicious. If unsure Google it.

That's pretty much it. The process I use is very simple. It gets me the answers within a relatively quick time period and helped me make better decisions. Doing the analysis above I was able to determine when our defenses failed. I also discovered that we were being sent false positives and that the machines were perfectly fine. In those instances we could put the computers back in service with a high level of confidence. The benefits of doing that is that people aren't without machines for longer than needed. It also helped reduce workload in the IT department by reducing the number of computers that needed to be re-imaged.

The tool and its alternatives are much deeper and offer valuable information for decision making.

Conclusion

With Fireye’s Redline, security teams can make better decisions about potentially compromised computers. It’s a free tool, so it should fit nicely in the budget (no procurement process). It’s also an easy tool to pickup and just start using. There’s some good documentation and I know of at least one YouTube video available.

Of course, there are plenty of other reputable options. Volatility being the one that I see most people talking about. Whatever tool, taking the time to do some analysis on potentially compromised boxes is important. That information will provide a better picture of what’s happening in an environment. How to adjust defenses and identify false positives and just make better decisions overall.

This post first appeared on Exploring Information Security.

In Technology Tags Blue Team, Redline, Forensics, Incident Response
Comment

Latest PoDCASTS

Featured
Nov 25, 2025
How to Close the Cybersecurity Skills Gap with a Student Powered SOC
Nov 25, 2025
Nov 25, 2025
Nov 18, 2025
What is the 2025 State of the API Report From Postman?
Nov 18, 2025
Nov 18, 2025
Nov 11, 2025
How AI Will Transform Society and Affect the Cybersecurity Field
Nov 11, 2025
Nov 11, 2025
Nov 4, 2025
[RERELEASE] How Macs get Malware
Nov 4, 2025
Nov 4, 2025
Oct 28, 2025
[RERELEASE] Why communication in infosec is important - Part 2
Oct 28, 2025
Oct 28, 2025
Oct 21, 2025
[RERELEASE] Why communication in infosec is important
Oct 21, 2025
Oct 21, 2025
Oct 14, 2025
Exploring AI, APIs, and the Social Engineering of LLMs
Oct 14, 2025
Oct 14, 2025
Oct 7, 2025
How to Prepare a Presentation for a Cybersecurity Conference
Oct 7, 2025
Oct 7, 2025
Sep 23, 2025
Exploring the Rogue AI Agent Threat with Sam Chehab
Sep 23, 2025
Sep 23, 2025
Sep 16, 2025
A conversation with Kyle Andrus on Info Stealers and Supply Chain Attacks
Sep 16, 2025
Sep 16, 2025

Powered by Squarespace